Wednesday, March 16, 2011

One Risk Not Fitting In?

At some point everyone finds themselves with a submission that seemingly doesn't fit. You're trying to finalize your clients overall insurance portfolio and you have this one puzzle piece that you just can't easily plug into place. It could be that your best customer gave you a referral with no idea how "non-standard" it is, or an existing client has pending or paid claims in the past year. Or maybe your bosses son-in-law is just now launching a new business venture.

Whatever the scenario, there are a few steps you can take that will speed up the process of getting the risk quoted, and quite possibly increase your chances of getting it quoted competitively. Here are a few issues you may have to contend with:

Losses: Don't wait to be asked for loss runs, provide them. That alone will move the process ahead faster. Most of the time either the agent or the client feel it's going to be worse if the loss runs are presented, especially if they show a loss or two. It's possible providing a loss run will be a problem, but it may also help. How? If the loss is open and "older" (more than 12 months) and the loss reserve remains the same or is reduced that's better than seeing a larger or increasing reserve amount. Also if the loss run from a year ago showed the claim as open and a current loss run has it closed, that's a better position from which to negotiate with a carrier. A closed claim, even if it seems like a high amount, is at least a "known" factor. The concern with a claim with an open reserve is the reserve can always go higher.

If losses have been the problem for your client, another way to potentially help is to get a narrative from the client as to any changes in procedures, staffing or other parts of their operation that have been implemented to prevent similar future losses. In this regard, if there's a story to tell - tell it. If the insurance carrier has free risk management service available, take advantage of it, especially if it can help your client reduce premiums and/or get out of the surplus lines market and back to the admitted market.

New In Business: Standard companies can have a difficult time writing new business operations, but there usually are very good alternative market options available. You can increase your chances of getting the account written with good terms if can provide information regarding qualifications. That would include resume's, special training, prior experience and education.

Operations/Services: You may have a tough time placing an account because the operations are considered high risk. If your client is designing and installing a "system" to prevent bridge piling erosion, it's going to be a tough placement. To optimize your chances of getting the best terms from what will be a limited number of markets, make sure the underwriter has a clear explanation of the services your client is performing. It might be necessary to be sure to list the services they do NOT offer that other similar businesses will offer to make that distinction.

The perception might be that your client is in a high risk occupation, but with proper info it may not be as much of an issue. For example I just worked on a consultant that trained others how to work through the processes to ship hazardous materials. Many carriers can't touch a risk associated with hazardous materials in any way. Other carriers were able to quote the account but only after they understood what the insured did NOT do, i.e. they did not instruct on how to ship or pack the materials, they did classroom instruction for those individuals who checked the shipments and made sure the paperwork was accurate and complete.

Bottom line; when you are thinking about details of an account, when in doubt, include the info. As you know, if you leave most company underwriters with the need to interpret a risk and rate it more conservatively vs more aggressively, most of the time you're going to get a conservative outcome. That means the carrier will rate it higher, restrict limits and/or just flat out decline it.

Take some time to get the pieces in place and you will go a long way to resolving this puzzle.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Title Agents Business, and How To Keep Your Clothes On?

Really, really good agents can sometimes get in trouble through simple misunderstandings and missed communications. Sometimes that can happen with customers, and sometimes with brokers or carriers. I'm aware of a couple of situations recently that have popped up and need to make you aware so you don't find yourself with your pants (skirt, shorts, etc) around your ankles.

Most title agencies have some escrow exposure, it's just a part of what they do. While I understand that some professionals involved with title work do not have any involvement with escrow, they're in the minority.

At least one carrier has developed an endorsement to be included on the E&O policy issued to title agency businesses. That endorsement includes wording that basically says there's no coverage for ANY escrow transaction. According to a friend of mine on their book, at least two different agencies are about to find out how good their own E&O policy and carrier are, as two different claim scenarios have developed that the insurance carrier is denying on the basis of the endorsement wording.

Fortunately we didn't handle these accounts so I'm not sure which part of the "chain" failed, but I'm well acquainted with the carrier and I'm pretty sure it wasn't them. They provide all wording and endorsements with their quote, so likely either the agent or the broker failed to clearly communicate this limiting wording to their customer. And even if they did, it makes no sense to sell a title agency a policy that doesn't offer coverage for escrow transactions. That's almost like selling a restaurant a policy that excludes cooking.

(Yes, I know some "restaurants" don't cook anything. Don't be distracted by my analogy - since this is a claims made policy, even for those rare cases where the exposure doesn't exist now, if they ever did any escrow work in the past there's no coverage for that either). Now apply that to a title agency that doesn't currently do escrow work but did so in the past and their E&O policy has a 1996 retro date. That's a major problem if there's no escrow coverage now.

If you're not sure about the options available or would simply like to discuss the account(s) you have now, let us know. We're interested in staying fully dressed, just like you.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Have We Got A Great "Combo" For You

(The combo pictured isn't what we're offering, but if you write enough of this business with us you never know!)

We have a new product that could be very helpful to you, especially if you have a client that needs E&O and GL and your standard market can't provide that option. And even if they can provide the option, you may want to make sure your client knows if the limits are shared or not, and if the E&O coverage is a broad or restricted form.

One of our non-admitted markets has given us the go ahead to offer a combination policy that provides claims made E&O plus occurrence form GL.

The highlights are as follows:
  • Minimum premiums start at $750
  • Limits to $5 MILL are available (for qualifying risks)
  • Carrier is AM Best rated A++ XV
  • GL per ISO 12-07 edition
  • Quotes provided from any carriers E&O app
Additional coverage options are being discussed, like Hired and Non-Owned Auto and Employee Benefits Liability. Both would be offered at a sub-limit. We're not there yet but as soon as we get the OK to add those coverages we'll notify you.

Contact us for more information.